<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Meetings: Are You My Mother?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/the-future-of-meetings-are-you-my-mother/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/the-future-of-meetings-are-you-my-mother/</link>
	<description>Attendee Engagement for Events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:09:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Caird</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/the-future-of-meetings-are-you-my-mother/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Caird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/?p=1766#comment-747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very interesting post - and comments.  I like the idea of &#039;mass customization&#039; mentioned by Dave Lutz.  It seems to me that the post and the comments are addressing the large scale, pay to attend, conference type meetings.  I think that the more routine types of meetings that occur at a company or in an organization  could benefit from addressing many of the ideas as well. Is it possible, perhaps even easier to begin work at a &#039;micro&#039; level, say at a company&#039;s biannual sales meeting, for example, where interaction, information sharing, efficiency, productivity, satisfaction and tangible results are critical to all of the stake holders?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting post &#8211; and comments.  I like the idea of &#8216;mass customization&#8217; mentioned by Dave Lutz.  It seems to me that the post and the comments are addressing the large scale, pay to attend, conference type meetings.  I think that the more routine types of meetings that occur at a company or in an organization  could benefit from addressing many of the ideas as well. Is it possible, perhaps even easier to begin work at a &#8216;micro&#8217; level, say at a company&#8217;s biannual sales meeting, for example, where interaction, information sharing, efficiency, productivity, satisfaction and tangible results are critical to all of the stake holders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Eisenstodt</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/the-future-of-meetings-are-you-my-mother/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan Eisenstodt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/?p=1766#comment-746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Sam - it IS being tried!  7 years ago, I created a prototype with a group of women in the industry who desperately wanted different. We&#039;ve kept it small and by invitation only - and only women for personal reasons - and we are doing some amazing work yearly at a gathering.

It IS being tried by John Nawn and a few others of us who hope to launch a prototype soon where it will be broadened to bring to the table .. the fire chiefs, the architects and designers, the furniture makers and more - and be a think-tank that does it and plays with it.

It SHOULD be done at the MPIs, PCMAs, ASAEs -- where failure is a positive word bec. you tried and analyzed it.

And it needs to be affordable -- to participate.  My airline ticket alone for Vancouver was a bank-breaker!  People have great ideas and too many people just can&#039;t afford to attend.

Years ago, I woulda said that if it&#039;s impt. to you, you&#039;d find a way to do it.  I no longer believe that bec. when one has to choose a roof over one&#039;s head and food on the table and healthcare v. exploring ideas .. well, the intellect says one thing until reality sets in.

So now what?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sam &#8211; it IS being tried!  7 years ago, I created a prototype with a group of women in the industry who desperately wanted different. We&#8217;ve kept it small and by invitation only &#8211; and only women for personal reasons &#8211; and we are doing some amazing work yearly at a gathering.</p>
<p>It IS being tried by John Nawn and a few others of us who hope to launch a prototype soon where it will be broadened to bring to the table .. the fire chiefs, the architects and designers, the furniture makers and more &#8211; and be a think-tank that does it and plays with it.</p>
<p>It SHOULD be done at the MPIs, PCMAs, ASAEs &#8212; where failure is a positive word bec. you tried and analyzed it.</p>
<p>And it needs to be affordable &#8212; to participate.  My airline ticket alone for Vancouver was a bank-breaker!  People have great ideas and too many people just can&#8217;t afford to attend.</p>
<p>Years ago, I woulda said that if it&#8217;s impt. to you, you&#8217;d find a way to do it.  I no longer believe that bec. when one has to choose a roof over one&#8217;s head and food on the table and healthcare v. exploring ideas .. well, the intellect says one thing until reality sets in.</p>
<p>So now what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samueljsmith</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/the-future-of-meetings-are-you-my-mother/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[samueljsmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/?p=1766#comment-745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Joan:  First, thanks for reading the blog and contributing. Second, thanks for sharing so many of your ideas. They make me wonder when are we going to go out and try these things? It seems like we should be able to create some proto-type environments where we can test out some of these things.

@Dave: Thanks for your comment here. You are so right about the connections. They were missing from the conversation and not discussed much. It was like the &quot;connections&quot; piece was either assumed or the discussions didn&#039;t offer any specific strategies for generating them. Great catch. 

@Garry: Thanks for reading and your contribution. I agree with you about the Twitter stream - it&#039;s a great way to stay connected to an event when you cannot attend.

@Jeff: Thanks for your comment, Jeff. The chef analogy is a great one - and I think you could take it further and challenge people to assemble new creations from these ingredients as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joan:  First, thanks for reading the blog and contributing. Second, thanks for sharing so many of your ideas. They make me wonder when are we going to go out and try these things? It seems like we should be able to create some proto-type environments where we can test out some of these things.</p>
<p>@Dave: Thanks for your comment here. You are so right about the connections. They were missing from the conversation and not discussed much. It was like the &#8220;connections&#8221; piece was either assumed or the discussions didn&#8217;t offer any specific strategies for generating them. Great catch. </p>
<p>@Garry: Thanks for reading and your contribution. I agree with you about the Twitter stream &#8211; it&#8217;s a great way to stay connected to an event when you cannot attend.</p>
<p>@Jeff: Thanks for your comment, Jeff. The chef analogy is a great one &#8211; and I think you could take it further and challenge people to assemble new creations from these ingredients as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hurt</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/the-future-of-meetings-are-you-my-mother/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Hurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/?p=1766#comment-744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam:

Great post about the variety of options available for meeting and event professionals when planning their meetings. We have a lot of choices and that&#039;s why I think meeting professionals need to become like well established chefs that know the right amount of spices and ingredients to mix into the recipe for a great dish.

I do believe that technology will continue to drive some changes. And I think attendees will continue to demand high-touch, highly customized experiences and engagement with each other and the content. 

Thanks for capturing this information and the challenge that each meeting professional must face.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam:</p>
<p>Great post about the variety of options available for meeting and event professionals when planning their meetings. We have a lot of choices and that&#8217;s why I think meeting professionals need to become like well established chefs that know the right amount of spices and ingredients to mix into the recipe for a great dish.</p>
<p>I do believe that technology will continue to drive some changes. And I think attendees will continue to demand high-touch, highly customized experiences and engagement with each other and the content. </p>
<p>Thanks for capturing this information and the challenge that each meeting professional must face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry Polmateer</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/the-future-of-meetings-are-you-my-mother/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garry Polmateer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/?p=1766#comment-743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great post and I&#039;m in agreement, the future of meetings could be a combination of these factors, or something completely unique to the group and not mentioned here.

I think all of these topics have merit and are worth discussing during meeting planning and it&#039;s truly the group dynamics, the goals for the meeting, and a combination of unique factors that creates a great meeting for your organization.

Having a technology background myself, I think technology will continue to play a role in meetings that will grow, but it is not the future in and of itself.  I love watching my Twitter stream when I can&#039;t attend a meeting, as it works well to get the word out, but it&#039;s no substitute for actually going.  I&#039;ve been to &quot;online&quot; conferences but they are a pale version of the real thing.

Thanks,

Garry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post and I&#8217;m in agreement, the future of meetings could be a combination of these factors, or something completely unique to the group and not mentioned here.</p>
<p>I think all of these topics have merit and are worth discussing during meeting planning and it&#8217;s truly the group dynamics, the goals for the meeting, and a combination of unique factors that creates a great meeting for your organization.</p>
<p>Having a technology background myself, I think technology will continue to play a role in meetings that will grow, but it is not the future in and of itself.  I love watching my Twitter stream when I can&#8217;t attend a meeting, as it works well to get the word out, but it&#8217;s no substitute for actually going.  I&#8217;ve been to &#8220;online&#8221; conferences but they are a pale version of the real thing.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Garry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lutz</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/the-future-of-meetings-are-you-my-mother/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Lutz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/?p=1766#comment-742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam, great post! It&#039;s about mass customization...designing and enabling personalized attendee experiences.  

Also, you left off one common attendee desire off your list - &quot;connections&quot;. They want to leave with more of them and add depth to the ones that they already have. Attendees don&#039;t want to feel like a number either.

Looking forward to reading the comments!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, great post! It&#8217;s about mass customization&#8230;designing and enabling personalized attendee experiences.  </p>
<p>Also, you left off one common attendee desire off your list &#8211; &#8220;connections&#8221;. They want to leave with more of them and add depth to the ones that they already have. Attendees don&#8217;t want to feel like a number either.</p>
<p>Looking forward to reading the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Eisenstodt</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/the-future-of-meetings-are-you-my-mother/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan Eisenstodt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/?p=1766#comment-741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s all of the above and it&#039;s individualizable ((did I make that up? - think of it as diff. than &quot;customizable&quot;) by whomever wants to participate and it can be done session by session (at 1 meeting) or broadly by selecting from meetings where you can go to &quot;taste&quot; a bit of it but not buy the whole. (OY I just realized that was my gelato experience! -- it really had an impact!)

What I mean by that is what if there were wonderfully comfortable chair on wheels (that locked down when I were seated, as an example) that I could take to some sessions or just use in a hallway or exhibit hall when I wanted to sit and have a conversation - one of what Maarten calls a &quot;campfire chat&quot;?  The chair could be designed to also hold my stuff - a back-pack like device so it would be useful.  Then wherever I was I&#039;d have my personalized comfortable seating.

What if I had w/ me a replica of a painting that made me feel good - in one case it might be &quot;Water lilies&quot; - in another case, a DeKooning or in another one I&#039;d created at a creativity area and brought along and it could hang on the back of a chair in front of or near me so I could always view it. Or for those who are using tech w/ a device that can do all things at once, on it?

What if, as Sue Pelletier suggested, outside the room there were a sensory dipping area where I could pick up a container of what I wanted to touch - smell - taste - see and it were with me.

And if I were participating virtually while there or not there .. well, this could go on for pages.

It&#039;s all doable -- scalable -- we just have to try and bring everyone to the table who wants to join this convo. starting w/ convention authorities and chiefs of police and fire marshals and designers of furniture and .. stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all of the above and it&#8217;s individualizable ((did I make that up? &#8211; think of it as diff. than &#8220;customizable&#8221;) by whomever wants to participate and it can be done session by session (at 1 meeting) or broadly by selecting from meetings where you can go to &#8220;taste&#8221; a bit of it but not buy the whole. (OY I just realized that was my gelato experience! &#8212; it really had an impact!)</p>
<p>What I mean by that is what if there were wonderfully comfortable chair on wheels (that locked down when I were seated, as an example) that I could take to some sessions or just use in a hallway or exhibit hall when I wanted to sit and have a conversation &#8211; one of what Maarten calls a &#8220;campfire chat&#8221;?  The chair could be designed to also hold my stuff &#8211; a back-pack like device so it would be useful.  Then wherever I was I&#8217;d have my personalized comfortable seating.</p>
<p>What if I had w/ me a replica of a painting that made me feel good &#8211; in one case it might be &#8220;Water lilies&#8221; &#8211; in another case, a DeKooning or in another one I&#8217;d created at a creativity area and brought along and it could hang on the back of a chair in front of or near me so I could always view it. Or for those who are using tech w/ a device that can do all things at once, on it?</p>
<p>What if, as Sue Pelletier suggested, outside the room there were a sensory dipping area where I could pick up a container of what I wanted to touch &#8211; smell &#8211; taste &#8211; see and it were with me.</p>
<p>And if I were participating virtually while there or not there .. well, this could go on for pages.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all doable &#8212; scalable &#8212; we just have to try and bring everyone to the table who wants to join this convo. starting w/ convention authorities and chiefs of police and fire marshals and designers of furniture and .. stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
