<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interactive Meeting Technology &#187; execution</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/tag/execution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com</link>
	<description>Attendee Engagement for Events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Do You Allocate Enough Time For Interaction?</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/do-you-allocate-enough-time-for-interaction/</link>
		<comments>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/do-you-allocate-enough-time-for-interaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel J Smith]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interaction design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attendees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meeting design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemtgtech.wordpress.com/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently read that 80% of learning is informal. This statistic was published in a fascinating article called &#8220;Learning Gets Social&#8221; in the August issue of Training &#38; Development. While I am not smart enough to challenge the validity of this number, I am smart enough to ask this question:  If learning is informal AND face to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/do-you-allocate-enough-time-for-interaction/">Do You Allocate Enough Time For Interaction?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com">Interactive Meeting Technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently read that <strong>8</strong><strong>0% of learning is informal. </strong>This statistic was published in a fascinating article called &#8220;<a href="http://www.astd.org/TD/Archives/2009/August/Free/0908_Learning_Gets_Social.htm" target="_blank">Learning Gets Social</a>&#8221; in the August issue of Training &amp; Development. While I am not smart enough to challenge the validity of this number, I am smart enough to ask this question:  <strong>If learning is informal AND face to face events are so important &#8211; do you think there is enough time being allocated to interaction in events?</strong></p>
<div>Too often, I see agendas that are packed with speakers and barely any free time.  If you are serious about engaging attendees, then you need to consider setting aside time for interaction. Here are some questions that might want to ask yourself:</div>
<h4><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-432" title="Lego_guys_talking.006" src="http://interactivemtgtech.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/lego_guys_talking-006.jpg" alt="Lego_guys_talking.006" width="400" height="300" /></h4>
<h4>1. How Much Are Attendees Passively Listening vs Actively Contributing?</h4>
<p>Not long ago, I came across a report by Crystal Interactive (<a href="http://www.crystal-interactive.co.uk/reportsform.htm" target="_blank">Creating Internal Events that are Fit For Purpose</a>) that surveyed UK corporate and internal events and found that 90% of the learning time is spent passively listening. While only 10% is spent participating in interactive activities.  I was blown away by the numbers and suggest that you read the report (see link above). The body of the report offers several suggestions for thinking through objectives, managing time and interaction in an internal corporate event.</p>
<h4>2. What happens following the motivational keynote speech?</h4>
<p>In the article “<a href="http://www.mimegasite.com/mimegasite/articles/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003973218" target="_blank">How Not to Use a Great Speaker</a>”, Ed Bernacki describes a motivational keynote speech that missed its mark &#8211; because there was no time set aside for interaction and reflection with other attendees after the speech.  He suggests allocating 20-30 minutes for attendees to discuss the presentation&#8217;s key themes in small groups. This way you can get extra value from the investment in the speaker and allow attendees to build a stronger connection to the content and its message.</p>
<h4>3. Will there be several people in the audience as knowledgeable as the speaker on the selected topic?</h4>
<p>The line between the experts on the stage and the attendees in the audience is blurring. Attendees have access to much more research and knowledge than in the past. In some topic areas, new case studies and insights are emerging everyday. If the topic fits this profile make sure you allocate time to get the perspective of other knowledgeable participants.</p>
<h4>4. Sooo&#8230;how much time should you allocate to interaction?</h4>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;">Crystal Interactive recommends that you allocate 30-50% of learning time to interactive activities. While a recent case study by Ron Springer of Espirit Productions showed that business results were achieved by increasing interaction from 26% to 58% and cutting PowerPoint Presentations in half from 50.6% of time to 24%.  (<a href="http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/engag-event-participants-to-generate-bottom-line-results/" target="_blank">Read Case Study</a>)</span></strong></p>
<h4>Bottom Line</h4>
<p>You control how attendees spend their time at your events. If you want them to interact more, then consider allocating more time to interaction activities.</p>
<p>How much time are you allocating for interaction?</p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;">
<p><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http://interactivemtgtech.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/do-you-allocate-enough-time-for-interaction/&amp;source=samueljsmith"><img style="border:0 initial initial;" src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http://interactivemtgtech.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/do-you-allocate-enough-time-for-interaction/" alt="" width="51" height="61" /></a></p>
<p><em>Photo Credit: </em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sadi-junior/2708530652/sizes/o/" target="_blank"><em>SadJr</em></a></div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/do-you-allocate-enough-time-for-interaction/">Do You Allocate Enough Time For Interaction?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com">Interactive Meeting Technology</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/do-you-allocate-enough-time-for-interaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insights from Jack Morton on Event Tech Strategy</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/insights-from-jack-morton-on-event-tech-strategy/</link>
		<comments>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/insights-from-jack-morton-on-event-tech-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel J Smith]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attendees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delegates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meeting design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemtgtech.wordpress.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This morning, I was powering through my backlog of “toread” articles when I ran across two articles from Jack Morton that are worth discussing: “The Power of Smart: Integrated Event Technology” and “Orchestrating the (IT) Experience.” Think Beyond Tools. Focus on Attendees. I like the way they frame the discussion in the Power of Smart: [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/insights-from-jack-morton-on-event-tech-strategy/">Insights from Jack Morton on Event Tech Strategy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com">Interactive Meeting Technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http://interactivemtgtech.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/insights-from-jack-morton-on-event-tech-strategy/&amp;source=samueljsmith"><img style="border:0 initial initial;" src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http://interactivemtgtech.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/insights-from-jack-morton-on-event-tech-strategy/" alt="" width="51" height="61" /></a></div>
<p>This morning, I was powering through my backlog of “toread” articles when I ran across two articles from <a href="http://360.jackmorton.com/articles/articles.html" target="_blank">Jack Morton</a> that are worth discussing: “The Power of Smart: Integrated Event Technology” and  “Orchestrating the (IT) Experience.”</p>
<h4>Think Beyond Tools. Focus on Attendees.</h4>
<p>I like the way they frame the discussion in the <a href="http://360.jackmorton.com/articles/article080609.php" target="_blank">Power of Smart: Integrated Event Technology</a>. They help you move beyond technology tools to focus on attendees, operational efficiency and expanding the event.  The author describes the Power of Smart as using integrated event solutions to “make life easier, more efficient and more effective.” Then, she defines integrated event technology as including the following three categories:</p>
<ol>
<li>Applications that enhance the attendee’s experience</li>
<li>Applications that make the event marketer’s job easier.</li>
<li>Applications that help the event reach new audiences and generate new revenue streams.</li>
</ol>
<p>To me, this framework makes it easier to create attendee focused questions like &#8211; what can I do to improve the attendee’s experience? What tools can I provide attendees to help them achieve their event objectives? I like those questions much better than starting with &#8211; should we do something on facebook?</p>
<h4><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-257" title="Touchpoints" src="http://interactivemtgtech.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/touchpoint-004.jpg" alt="Touchpoints" width="400" height="300" /></h4>
<h4>Orchestrating Success. Focus on Touchpoints.</h4>
<p>The article <a href="http://360.jackmorton.com/articles/article101508_2.php" target="_blank">Orchestrating the (IT) Experience</a> focuses on execution of the IT experience. What I liked most about Jack Morton’s approach here is the ruthless focus on attendees and their technology touchpoints. The author encourages you to match the right technology in the right amount (scale and scope) to the experience that you want to create.  I think they are right on target here. Plus, I would add: make sure that your digital touchpoints are planned, scrutinized and tested in the same way that you handle your face2face touchpoints.</p>
<h4>Bottom Line</h4>
<p>The attendee’s experience at your event is the sum total of your face-to-face and digital experiences. You need to keep a sharp focus on your attendees, touchpoints and execution.</p>
<p>Does the digital strategy for your event start with attendees and touchpoints? Or do you find yourself starting in the techno-soup?</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/insights-from-jack-morton-on-event-tech-strategy/">Insights from Jack Morton on Event Tech Strategy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com">Interactive Meeting Technology</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/insights-from-jack-morton-on-event-tech-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
