<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interactive Meeting Technology &#187; #eventprofs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/tag/eventprofs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com</link>
	<description>Attendee Engagement for Events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Event Camp East Coast: Unplugged</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/event-camp-east-coast-unplugged/</link>
		<comments>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/event-camp-east-coast-unplugged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel J Smith]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#eventprofs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conferences that work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecec10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EventCamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/?p=1989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This weekend, I attended Event Camp East Coast. It was organized as a structured unconference and followed the Conferences that Work model. Conferences That Work is one of many group processes that put the participants at the center of the event to establish common ground, build community and create something together. There was no agenda. There [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/event-camp-east-coast-unplugged/">Event Camp East Coast: Unplugged</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com">Interactive Meeting Technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1992" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://interactivemtgtech.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/8cyj.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1992" title="Event Camp East Coast Improv" src="http://interactivemtgtech.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/8cyj.jpg" alt="Event Camp East Coast Improv" width="500" height="375" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Event Camp East Coast &quot;Improv Orchestra&quot; Conducted by Jenise Fryatt</p></div>
<p>This weekend, I attended <a href="http://eventcampeastcoast.com/">Event Camp East Coast</a>.  It was organized as a<strong> structured unconference</strong> and followed the <a href="http://www.conferencesthatwork.com/">Conferences that Work</a> model. Conferences That Work is one of many group processes that put the participants at the center of the event to establish common ground, build community and create something together.</p>
<p>There was no agenda. There were no powerpoints. No overhead projectors. And no presentations. There were no speakers. There was no looking at the back of anyone’s head in sessions.</p>
<p>Are you still with me?</p>
<p>There was no production equipment. No stages. No livestream. And only a light twitter stream. The most advanced technology at the event was <a href="http://eventmobi.com/home/#overview">EventMobi </a>from<a href="http://eventcampeastcoast.conferencespot.org/user_profiles/bob-vaez"> Bob Vaez</a>.</p>
<p>The event was unplugged. Yet, we were so plugged in.</p>
<h4>Identifying Our Talents and Strengths</h4>
<p><strong><code>[wpvideo FPYLWrVa]</code></strong></p>
<p>There were two key processes that helped us get started. The first was a process called the &#8220;round table.&#8221;  In that process, we went around the room and answered three questions:</p>
<p>&gt; Who are you</p>
<p>&gt; What do you want out of the event</p>
<p>&gt; What can you offer</p>
<p>Two scribes then took notes on flip charts and posted those around the room.</p>
<p>Out of that process, <strong>I learned about the hidden talents of the other attendees that were in the room</strong>. So, when it was my turn to go &#8211; I could say &#8211; “I want to learn about Design from Deb Roth, Improv from Jenise Fryatt, Advanced Social Media from Kiki L’Italien and talk about Brain learning with anyone that wants to talk about it.” (<a href="http://twitter.com/brainstrength">@brainstrength</a> &#8211; identified herself as an expert on brain research when it was her turn.)</p>
<p>This process was lengthy and tiring, but it helped me get to know some key facts about the other attendees. This came in handy once we cracked open the wine.</p>
<h4>Tapping Into Our Wisdom</h4>
<p>[wpvideo cmgD8tfs]</p>
<p>While consuming wine and getting to know each other better, we started to build an agenda. This was the second step.</p>
<p>We created the agenda by coming up with discussion topics and then writing our name down beside each topic. If we had expertise and willingness to lead a session &#8211; we could indicate that with a letter code.</p>
<p>Then, while the rest of us continued to talk and network &#8211; a group of 6 people went into the “serious room” and sorted everything out. What emerged in the morning was a 14 session program that tapped into the collective wisdom and talents of the people that we had at the event.</p>
<p>For some people, this step was too unstructured and too slow for their tastes. For me,<strong> it gave me plenty of time to have productive and engaging conversations with a bunch of different people</strong> &#8211; including some who were skeptical.</p>
<p>I liked that.</p>
<h4>We The People</h4>
<p>The next morning was a lot of fun! The session rooms were setup with chairs organized in a circle with 1 flip chart. The session leader would kick off the session with a few points and then a dialogue would take place.</p>
<p>Each room had a circular seating arrangement. This made sure that <strong>we were all equal</strong>. We all had an opportunity to ask questions or make comments when we wanted. Since, we knew each other &#8211; the dialogue flowed much smoother than if we were unknowns in the session.</p>
<p>While we didn’t get a powerpoint deck with 62 slides from each presentation to take home &#8211; what we did get was a bunch of new resources for answers, help and support.</p>
<p>Those resources were our fellow attendees. The people.</p>
<h4>A Group Unites</h4>
<p>The final sessions gave us an opportunity to take a step back and reflect on what we had seen, experienced and learned.  Then we could choose to share those insights with  our colleagues around the room. (<strong>We had moved from “fellow attendees” to colleagues</strong> at this point).  Since each of us came from a different place we took away something different.</p>
<h4>Final Thoughts</h4>
<ol>
<li><strong>I have never been to a conference where I felt like I got to know so many new people so well</strong>. We shared together, learned together and established common ground.</li>
<li>I thought it was remarkably empowering to get to know the people around me and then say “I want to learn from you” and then go have a discussion with 10-18 other people that feel the same.</li>
<li>This isn’t the type of event format that lends itself to webcasting.  A video stream here would have failed &#8211; badly. It would have been like watching the Ann Arbor City Council on public access television &#8211; people would have left after 3 minutes. Then, they would have complained that the livestream was no good.</li>
<li>It takes courage to put on event like this. It takes courage to register and pay for an event like this. Yet, I would attend again &#8211; becaus<strong>e the networking and collaboration were so powerful</strong>.</li>
</ol>
<h4>Bottom Line</h4>
<p>We have a bunch of different formats and technologies that we can use in our events. Your selection of event format should depend on your objectives.  Not all formats are good for learning. Not all conference formats are good for engagement. Not all conference formats are right for livestreaming.</p>
<p>Event Camp East Coast was great for building a peer-to-peer community.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/event-camp-east-coast-unplugged/">Event Camp East Coast: Unplugged</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com">Interactive Meeting Technology</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/event-camp-east-coast-unplugged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After 110 Pages of Tweets is Twitter Worth It?</title>
		<link>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/after-110-pages-of-tweets-is-twitter-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/after-110-pages-of-tweets-is-twitter-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 06:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel J Smith]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#eventprofs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event Camp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-generated content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual participants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/?p=1446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 5, 2010 &#8211; I celebrated my first Twitterversary. It came and went without much fanfare as I forgot that it happened. However, I thought it was worth reviewing my progress over the past year. In my first 365 days, I wrote 2,743 tweets &#8211; which is about 110 pages worth of tweeting. I [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/after-110-pages-of-tweets-is-twitter-worth-it/">After 110 Pages of Tweets is Twitter Worth It?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com">Interactive Meeting Technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 5, 2010 &#8211; I celebrated my first Twitterversary. It came and went without much fanfare as I forgot that it happened. However, I thought it was worth reviewing my progress over the past year.</p>
<p>In my first 365 days, I wrote 2,743 tweets &#8211; which is about 110 pages worth of tweeting. I have to admit that I was shocked that I had written so many pages of tweets. (For the math people this assumes that each tweet takes up 1 line in a page and there are 25 lines per page.) It made stop for a few minutes and reflect on what I had learned over the past year from using this new tool.</p>
<p>Below are some things that I have learned. Have a look and then let me know if you think all of this tweeting was really worth it? or was it a massive waste of time? Of course, if you have things to add from your own experiences &#8211; please do so. The more the merrier!</p>
<p><a href="http://interactivemtgtech.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/twitter_lego-033.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1448" title="twitter_lego.033" src="http://interactivemtgtech.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/twitter_lego-033.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<h4><span style="font-weight:normal;">20 Things I Learned in My First Year of Tweeting</span></h4>
<ol>
<li>Twitter is a super-simple way to publish messages. How hard is it to write one sentence and hit send? Not hard.</li>
<li>When you have 1,000 followers it is impossible to listen to what everyone is saying with equal attention.</li>
<li>Tools like TweetDeck and Hootsuite help me organize my Twitter “ears” and listen to the people and conversations that are most important to me.</li>
<li>I choose the conversations to follow and dip my toe into other conversations of interest throughout the day.</li>
<li>In some twitter groups &#8211; members find and share articles that would be impossible for 1 person to find on his own and in a timely manner.</li>
<li>Twitter is a great way to spread content to like-minded individuals.</li>
<li>Twitter isn’t for all people.</li>
<li>Twitter is public &#8211; so it won’t work for any private or confidential corporate events.</li>
<li>Many-to-Many conversations on Twitter are fast-moving, action packed and fully archived. Watch what you say!</li>
<li>Conversations on Twitter can be archived at <a href="http://wthashtag.com/Eventprofs" target="_blank">wthashtag.com</a>. This is a great resource to go back and review what was said.</li>
<li>I once summarized a full conversation of tweets with 1 tweet. Is that good or bad?</li>
<li>I started this blog because of Twitter. I know 10 others that did the same.</li>
<li>Twitter is a super-simple way to connect remote and virtual attendees.</li>
<li>While the movers were packing boxes at my home, I participated in a conference via Twitter 4000 miles and nine time zones away.</li>
<li>Luckily, not everyone is on Twitter.</li>
<li>I never had any interest in following Shaq, Britney Oprah or Aston Kucher.</li>
<li>The #eventprofs community on Twitter is awesome.</li>
<li>I attended a conference in February because of the people that I met on Twitter.  I had an awesome time! Some people think I was crazy.</li>
<li>I attended a conference in March because someone tweeted that they were attending. Does that make me a stalker?</li>
<li>Twitter introduced me to thousands of interesting people in the past year. If it weren&#8217;t for them &#8211; I would have left this technology long ago.</li>
</ol>
<h4>Bottom Line</h4>
<p>While Twitter is a simple technology &#8211; it is a powerful communication tool. After 110 pages of tweets, I am very thankful for the people that I met on Twitter this past year. Without them &#8211; I probably would have abandoned the technology very quickly. Thank you Twitter friends!</p>
<p><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/2010/04/05/after-110-pages-of-tweets-is-twitter-worth-it/&amp;source=samueljsmith"><img style="border:0 initial initial;" src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http://interactivemeetingtechnology.com/2010/04/05/after-110-pages-of-tweets-is-twitter-worth-it/" alt="" width="51" height="61" /></a></p>
<h5><span style="font-weight:normal;"><em>image credit: </em></span><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cdharrison/"><span style="font-weight:normal;"><em>@cdharrison</em></span></a></h5>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/after-110-pages-of-tweets-is-twitter-worth-it/">After 110 Pages of Tweets is Twitter Worth It?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com">Interactive Meeting Technology</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.interactivemeetingtechnology.com/after-110-pages-of-tweets-is-twitter-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
